Reflecting about the Classical Arguement Papers

After reading the essays that I was suppose to critique and respond to, I realized that it was a helpful idea to do the groups. In all my others years in school, I never had the chance to have my peers read my essays. We did have maybe one other person read the essay, but other times it was just people reading them if we asked them to; there never was any set person that read it or any time set aside to critique. When we meet as a group and discuss our papers, it is a useful tool for all of us to help improve our papers. Everyone critiques differently and having many different suggestions from more than one person gives me a wide variety of ways to change my paper to make it fit the guidelines. I have never been much of a huge fan of writing, so having people help give me suggestions to improve my papers makes it a lot less stressful. It makes me be able to know what I'm doing wrong and what needs to be fixed to be able to have a well written paper. I also am not a big fan of correcting papers because most the papers I have corrected in the past years are already pretty well written and there has never been any huge changes needed. I never seem to know what I should fix in papers. Correcting these papers allowed me to try my hardest to critique to the best of my ability, so I could give valid suggestions to help my groups paper. It was also interesting reading the topics and the way each person writes their papers. All writers have different unique styles in which they construct their ideas about a subject.